yaml2mindmap/data/judicial.yaml

218 lines
5.6 KiB
YAML
Raw Permalink Normal View History

2016-08-19 03:53:01 +03:00
judicial ethics:
canon 1:
childrenDirection:down
INTEGRITY:
pre-requisite of the rule of law
fundamental guarantee to a fair trial
in both individual and
institutional aspects
exemplify the two aspects:
individual independence
institutional independence
unswayed by:
partisan or personal interest
public opinion or fear of criticism
laws:
RA 3019 - anti graph
Artile 204 - rendering unjust judgment
a judge's family:
spouse
sons and daughters
son and daughter-in-law
consanguinity or affinity with 6 degrees
companion or employee who lives in household
canon 2:
INTEGRITY:
proper discharge of office
personal demeanor
steadfast adherence to strict moral and ethical code
justice done but also seen to be done
canon 3:
childrenDirection:down
IMPARTIALITY:
applies not only to the decision itself\nbut also to the process it is made
no consciousness or sense of favor, bias or prejudice
rule of necessity:
a biased judge is better than no judge at all
disqualification (section 5):
1. actual bias or personal knowledge on evidentiary facts
2. previously served as lawyer
3. member of family has pecuniary interest in outcome
4. served as guardian, executor, administrator\nformer associate served as counsel during the association\nwas material witness
5. ruling in a lower court under his review
6. related 6th degree to litigant, 4th degree to counsel
7. child, spouse, has financial interest in the subject matter
remittal:
1. Disclosure
2. incorporated in the Records
3. Acceptance by all
4. Writing
under rules of court:
1. wife, child, pecuniary interest
2. related 6th, 4th
3. executor, guardian, trustee or counsel
4. presided in a lower court
voluntary inhibition:
sound discretion
just and valid reasons
prejudice must be shown from extraneous sources
canon 4:
direction:left
childrenDirection:down
PROPRIETY:
free from any whiff of impropriety
section 8:
not use position to advance private interest
not give impression that she can be influenced
confidential information, violation:
RPC 229, revelation of secrets by officer
RPC 230, revelation of secrets of private individual
RA 3019 Sec 3[k] divulging valuable information, officer
extra-activities of judges:
judicially-related activities\n... consti prohibits quasi-judicial functions
must not detract from the dignity of judicial office
must not interfere with performance
financial activities:
1. reflect adversely
2. interfere with performance
3. persons and lawyers likely to come before court
fiduciary activities:
gr, not serve as:
a. executor
b. administrator
c. trustee
d. guardian
except:
immediate family member\naa.limited to spouse\nb.relative within 2nd degree\n..by consanguinity
prohibited from private practice:
not private practice:
not habitual or customarily holding
isolated cases
cannot act:
gift:
insignificant value
regularity of the occasion
source of the gift\n..from party-litigant, value is immaterial
loans
favors
canon 5:
direction:left
EQUALITY:
no bias from judge
from staff
from lawyers
canon 6:
direction:left
COMPETENCE:
earnest willigness and capability to promptly do\nwhat is required in accordance to rules
Liabilities:
direction:left
not liable in absence of fraud, dishonesty, or corruption
except:
when error is so gross or patent
or when procedure is so basic or elementary
civil:
Article 27
Artilce 32
damages in general
rpc:
1. Article 204, unjust judgment
2. Article 205, judgment rendered through negligence
3. Article 206, unjust orders
serious charges:
bribery
dishonesty
gross misconduct
unjust judgment
gross ignorance
less serious charges:
undue delay in rendering decision
habitual absences, tardiness
unauthorized practice
simple misconduct
light charges:
vulgar and unbecoming conduct
gambling
fraternizing with lawyers and litigants
undue delay is reports
Discipline:
direction:left
serious misconduct:
implies malice or wrongful intent
inefficiency:
incompetence, gross negligence
filing:
SC motu proprio
verified complaint with affidavits
anonymous complaint with public record of indubitable integrity
administrative proceeding ~ substantial evidence
disbarment ~ preponderance